TRANSLATE

The Movement Down Under

About the Author

Richard Louv is Co-Founder and Chairman Emeritus of the Children & Nature Network, an organization supporting the international movement to connect children, their families and their communities to the natural world. He is the author of nine books, including "Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder" and "The Nature Principle." His newest book, "Vitamin N," offers 500 ways to build a nature-rich life. In 2008, he was awarded the Audubon Medal.

“We gain life by looking at life.” Those are the words of Dr. Mardie Townsend, a researcher and associate professor in the School of Health and Social Development at Deakin University in Victoria, Australia, and an important thinker about the importance of the natural world to human development.

She added, in an interview with the Sydney Morning Herald, “If we see living things we don’t feel as if we’re living in a vacuum.”

That sense of aloneness, without kinship in the natural world, is central to the argument that many of us are making these days; that is, if we deny children direct experience with nature, we deny them access to a fundamental part of their humanity.

In Last Child in the Woods, I coined the term nature-deficit disorder to serve as a descriptor of the human costs of alienation from nature, not as a medical diagnosis.

That’s one way to look at our lost kinship. Glenn Albrecht, director of the Institute of Sustainability and Technology Policy at Murdoch University in Perth, Australia, has coined a different term, with a related meaning — solastalgia — the unconscious fear of the loss of nature, a peculiar kind of homesickness.

Fortunately, there’s a growing international movement to connect children — and the rest of us — with nature. An appreciation of nature is rooted in the cultures of Australia.

Yet, that country — like the United States — has been battling the problems caused or exacerbated by a sedentary, de-natured life. I’m looking forward this month to my first visit to Australia, to learn about innovative ideas there.

I’ll be meeting and learning from people and speaking in Melbourne, Brisbane, Bendigo, and Perth. Two other board members of C&NN will also be speaking in Australia this month: Dr. Howard Frumkin, at International Congress 2010, Healthy Parks Healthy People, and Brother Yusuf Burgess, at Australia 2010.

In recent articles for Australia’s Active Education Magazine and Web Child (Australia Child Publications), I made the case that some of the best work on this issue is being conducted in Australia. Some examples of research there:

— Researchers found a relationship between more time spent outdoors and a lower presence of myopia (near-sightedness) among 12-year-olds in Sydney. The study, reported in the journal Ophthalmology, found that 12-year-olds with the highest levels of near-work activity and lowest levels of outdoor activity were two to three times more likely than their peers to develop myopia.

— A 2009 policy brief from the Centre for Community Child Health, Television and Early Childhood Development, states that young Australian children spent more time television-watching than in any other activity — not counting sleep. Many Australian children live in households where the TV is on nonstop, as a babysitter. (In the U.S., a new Kaiser Family Foundation study found that young people age 8-18 spend more than 53 hours a week plugged into electronic media.)

— Kathleen Bagot, of the School of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine at Monash University in Melbourne, has investigated the effects of green play on children. Her study suggests that the higher the level of vegetation around the school, the more highly children rate that environment as restorative. “Greener playgrounds elicit fascination, which is an effortless type of interest, rather than concentration, which can be hard work,” Bagot has explained.

— Researchers at the University of New South Wales found that community gardens were effective in promoting neighborhood renewal in public high-rise housing estates in inner Sydney, and determined that the gardens created a great sense of belonging, friendship and generosity amongst the gardeners and a sense of community on the estates. They were also found to break down cultural barriers as well as promote physical activity and good nutrition principles.

One of the most useful documents on the importance of nature to people is Healthy Parks, Healthy People, a 2008 comprehensive review of relevant literature conducted by researchers at Melbourne’s Deakin University in cooperation with Parks Victoria. At the end of the report is an annotated list of the main benefits to the health and well-being of individuals that arise from contact with nature.

The issue of nature-deficit disorder is also getting more media attention in Australia. This month, in the national newspaper, The Age, environmental reporter Peter Ker reported on the disconnect between children and nature — and the frictions that sometimes emerge when somebody tries to do something about it.

He described how, in Melbourne, plans to establish a community garden within one park sparked local anger. One group of locals wanted the space to grow plants, while others saw the move as a reduction of existing park space for the benefit of few.

With that controversy in mind, Deakin University’s Mardie Townsend suggested to Ker the scouring (of) the urban environment for places to establish new parks and community gardens, including taking advantage of laneways, disused blocks of land and river frontages that are unsuitable for housing developments.

In the long term she added, private companies could turn some of their land into public recreation spaces. “Think of a place like Chadstone [shopping centre], where they have miles of car-parking and have two or three layers. Why not make the top one a [nature] park, which keeps everything cool under that roof and provides a wonderful open space for people,” she told Ker. “People are far more likely to go to Chadstone if there’s a nice park there, where they can sit and have their lunch before going in to shop, so it becomes an economic attractor to business.”

I love that idea. It’s a good companion to the button parks that the Children & Nature Network would like to promote in the U.S. and other countries. Nature shouldn’t just be an exotic adventure, but a place down the street, or in our own yards. Why? As Dr. Townsend said, “We gain life by looking at life.” And touching and holding and hearing it, by using all of our senses in nature. This is the life our children deserve, in every country, on every continent.

______________

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google+
  • Buffer
Richard Louv is chairman of the Children and Nature Network. He is the author of “Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder.”

6 Comments

  1. As an Australian it is wonderful to read that some of the most important work in this area is done by my fellow country folk. I had no idea, and I look forward to going through all the links you provided to find out more.

    I’m a preschool teacher and have been busy trawling the internet looking for information on Australian preschools and the work they are doing in reconnecting children to nature but so far I haven’t found anything (I may be looking in all the wrong places). This is one of our main goals at our preschool, and using our bush environment as a learning resource is one of the core values of our school. It would be wonderful to know of other preschools doing the same thing so we could share information and learn from each other.

    When we network with other preschool teachers at training courses we still come up against negative views on the fact that our program offers children the choice to play outside all day, every day if they choose. So its nice to know that there is movement afoot in Australia to show just how important outdoor and nature learning is for everyone.

    Reply
  2. Great to hear about more changes afoot. I look forward to hearing about the result of the trip as well.

    Reply
  3. I am a kindergarten assistant in what is probably the most beautiful Kindy in south east QLD. We are at the base of a huge lookout so our grounds are quite hilly and full of plants and trees. Our children love it, they are so happy to run around barefoot and explore in the jungle. We would have loved it if Richard had time to come out an visit us. We encourage the children to look around their environment to find what is interesting to them.

    Reply
  4. I had not heard of “solastalgia,” so I looked it up online and think it is an interesting term and important concept for Americans, too. It looks like it is defined as “the distress that is produced by environmental change impacting on people while they are directly connected to their home environment.” Most interesting to me is that researchers found that people exposed to environmental change experienced a negative affect that is exacerbated by a sense of powerlessness or lack of control over the unfolding change process. I think that many Americans feel a lack of control and powerlessness about so many things in life today – environmental change, the greed and power in corporate america, politics, etc. The question is, how can we empower people and take back some control in order to make changes for the better when it comes to these issues – especially when it comes to the environment?

    Jenni Veal
    http://www.YourOutdoorFamily.com
    Chattanooga, Tennessee

    Reply
  5. You have mentioned the data from a study performed by Kaiser Family Foundation that “young people age 8-18 spend more than 53 hours a week plugged into electronic media”. It is interesting to know that the pre-teen and teenagers are spending so many hours a week with the electronic media. The amount of time is even longer than the work hours of a regular full time job. I have seen my relative’s teenage children playing video games while having their meals. Unfortunately, a lot of parents are willing to let the children spend their time with electronic media rather than playing outside the house. One of the reasons could be the concern about safety.

    The way that our young generation getting so addicted to the electronic media is unhealthy. Obesity seems to be an obvious consequence of it. Furthermore, as you have mentioned, myopia is also a very likely side effect of watching the monitor or TV screen for a long time.

    Reply
  6. I moved to the United States from the third world country Burma when I was 12 years old. I think my personal story also aligns with the study that demonstrated that twelve-years-old children who spend less time in nature and more time doing near-work activities are more likely to get myopia. When I was in Burma, we did not have computers and there were limited television sets in town. So, as a kid, I spend most of the time outside playing. When I looked far into the rain forest in Burma, I saw a sharp image. After coming to the U.S and having learn to use computer and having the chance to watch TV everyday if I wanted to, I found that my distance-vision was getting poor. The relationship between developing myopia and doing near-work makes sense intuitively. But, it is nice that a study like this one is done so that it completely demonstrate the relationship.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

X


You're just two clicks away from
receiving C&NN News & Updates


Share This